What problems can the product help the target group solve?
Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2025 8:55 am
Want to see what webpages that don’t meet the “EEAT” standards look like? Come on: Google is very considerate:
Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines page 51
▲《Search Quality Raters Guidelines》page 51
The examples given are very realistic, such as writing a review of a restaurant without having eaten there; teaching others how to skydive without knowing how to do it; a cooking website asking you to download tax forms; a shopping website with no customer service information...
In short, Google still emphasizes that web page content must be true and meaningful, not false, and be able to provide value to users.
4. Examples of “harmful” and “harmless”
The guidelines also include examples of content that is harmful or harmless to "oneself or others" or "to a specific group". The guidelines have detailed table descriptions (as shown below), so I won't go into detail here:
Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines page 32
▲《Search Quality Raters Guidelines》page 32
Respond
Ok, we have talked so much about the updates to the Search Quality Raters Guidelines. So, what are the solutions for us in future SEO optimization?
Let me ask you a question: Do you want your website to be ranked on the greece b2b leads first page of Google? Do you want your website to have enviable traffic? Do you want high-quality inquiries?
I think everyone wants this, so first of all, I hope that friends who want to do SEO optimization by themselves should at least read and understand the "Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" and apply them to their actual work. After all, this is not too difficult to understand~
Yes, Google's latest updated "Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" link:
It's all in English, with a lot of text, but only 176 pages.
Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines page 51
▲《Search Quality Raters Guidelines》page 51
The examples given are very realistic, such as writing a review of a restaurant without having eaten there; teaching others how to skydive without knowing how to do it; a cooking website asking you to download tax forms; a shopping website with no customer service information...
In short, Google still emphasizes that web page content must be true and meaningful, not false, and be able to provide value to users.
4. Examples of “harmful” and “harmless”
The guidelines also include examples of content that is harmful or harmless to "oneself or others" or "to a specific group". The guidelines have detailed table descriptions (as shown below), so I won't go into detail here:
Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines page 32
▲《Search Quality Raters Guidelines》page 32
Respond
Ok, we have talked so much about the updates to the Search Quality Raters Guidelines. So, what are the solutions for us in future SEO optimization?
Let me ask you a question: Do you want your website to be ranked on the greece b2b leads first page of Google? Do you want your website to have enviable traffic? Do you want high-quality inquiries?
I think everyone wants this, so first of all, I hope that friends who want to do SEO optimization by themselves should at least read and understand the "Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" and apply them to their actual work. After all, this is not too difficult to understand~
Yes, Google's latest updated "Search Quality Evaluator Guidelines" link:
It's all in English, with a lot of text, but only 176 pages.