.. Of course, transnational platforms that have received

[sumaiyakhatun26]

A full or partial monopoly on the distribution of social capital do not need to rewrite their algorithms. They are completely satisfied with the current state of affairs. Whatever platform representatives publicly declare in the spirit of "we are working to provide people with a better experience," you should not believe them. This is, to put it mildly, disingenuous.


It is not without reason that the heads of Facebook and Apple are dragged to list of cyprus whatsapp phone numbers hearings in the US Congress, where they are asked unpleasant questions. It is not without reason that the US Department of Justice is trying to prove through the court that Google is abusing its monopoly position in the search and advertising market – in order to then forcibly split the corporation into several parts.


Unfortunately, the "social capital monopolists" have not yet been curbed at the level of sane governments or, say, the UN. And they continue to create unhealthy, distorted competition on their platforms between "social agents" - users, companies, small businesses, the self-employed, creative people. People respond to bias and manipulation of algorithms with chaotic cheating, attempts to adapt to the principles of their work, the already mentioned imitation of the behavior of successful competitors.